A personal journey: travel, technology, reviews, projects & diary — since 1995.
The Mandalorian and Grogu (2026)

The Mandalorian and Grogu (2026)

Din Djarin and his small green ward make the jump from streaming to the big screen, and the space-western tone survives the trip intact. Familiar, warm, and built for the rewatch. 8/10.

BBFC PG certificate

  • UK release: May 2026
  • Director: Jon Favreau  ·  Writers: Jon Favreau, Dave Filoni, Noah Kloor
  • Studio / distributor: Lucasfilm; Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
  • Genre: Space-western science fiction adventure  ·  Runtime: 132 minutes (BBFC PG)
  • Main cast: Pedro Pascal (The Mandalorian, The Last of Us) as Din Djarin; Sigourney Weaver (Alien, Aliens) as a New Republic officer; Jeremy Allen White (The Bear, The Iron Claw) as Rotta the Hutt
  • IMDb: rating to confirm  ·  Rotten Tomatoes: 63% critics / 89% audience  ·  My rating: 8 / 10

The interesting question hanging over The Mandalorian and Grogu is not whether it will be likeable. The series spent three seasons proving that a man in a helmet and a wide-eyed foundling could carry a story on charm alone. The question is whether a relationship grown on a streaming service, in tidy forty-minute chapters, can fill a cinema screen for two hours without feeling like four episodes glued end to end. Jon Favreau, who built the show and now directs its first theatrical outing, clearly knows the trap. What he delivers is less a season finale with a bigger budget than a proper Saturday-matinee adventure, the kind Lucasfilm has been circling since Rogue One and Solo without quite landing.

The setup

The Empire has fallen, but the galaxy it left behind is a patchwork of warlords, opportunists and old criminal families filling the gap. The fledgling New Republic, short on hands and shorter on muscle, calls in Din Djarin, the Mandalorian bounty hunter who would rather be left alone with his ward. The mission drags him into the wreckage of the Hutt underworld and the scattered remnants of Imperial power, and forces the recurring problem of the whole saga: a man bound by a creed he takes seriously, and a small Force-sensitive child who keeps making that creed complicated. The plot is a clothesline for set pieces rather than a puzzle, and the film is honest about that.

The cast

Pedro Pascal spends most of the film behind the beskar mask, which sounds like a limitation and is in fact the point of the performance. He has to act with shoulders, stance and a voice that gives nothing away for free, and after The Last of Us showed what he can do with an open face, it is a quiet pleasure to watch him do the opposite here. Grogu, still entirely a puppet-and-effects creation, remains the most expressive thing in the frame without a word of dialogue, and the film knows exactly when to cut to him. Sigourney Weaver lends the New Republic side some genuine gravity, the authority of someone who has carried far heavier films than this one. Jeremy Allen White, voicing a grown Rotta the Hutt, brings a flicker of menace and unexpected comedy to a corner of the underworld most fans had written off as a punchline.

The craft

Greig Fraser shoots Star Wars the way it always wanted to be shot: dusty, tactile, lit like a western, with real weight to the metal and the weather. After the flat, over-lit look of some recent franchise entries, this is a relief. The creature work is largely practical, and it shows in the way actors flinch at things that are actually there. Ludwig Göransson’s score does what his Mandalorian themes always did, marrying spaghetti-western twang to full orchestral swell, and it carries scenes the script leaves thin. At 132 minutes the film is paced like serialised television in the best sense, a clean sequence of objectives and reversals, though a viewer hoping for a denser story will feel the lightness.

How it stacks up

Set beside the recent Star Wars films, this is the most relaxed and the most sure of itself. Rogue One was grimmer and Solo more anxious to please; this one simply gets on with being an adventure, which is closer to the 1977 spirit than either. The obvious comparison is the series itself, and the honest verdict is that the film feels like a strong stretch of the show given room to breathe rather than a leap into a new register. The westerns Favreau is openly drawing on, the lone gunslinger reluctantly minding a child, the frontier town under the thumb of a local boss, are worn lightly and worn well.

Critics versus the rest of us

The split is wide and revealing. Critics are sitting around 63%, with the recurring complaint that the film is comfortable, familiar and a touch slight, an expensive episode rather than an event. Audiences have landed far higher, at 89%, the warmest reception any Disney-era Star Wars film has had. Both reactions are correct about the same film. It is familiar, and it is not reaching for anything new. It also delivers exactly what its audience came for, with a warmth and a confidence the franchise has been missing, and that counts for a great deal.

Verdict

I came in with a soft spot for the series and a worry that the jump to cinema would expose it. The worry was mostly unfounded. This is not the boldest Star Wars film, and it will not convert anyone the show did not already reach. What it is, is genuinely entertaining, handsomely made and built for the second and third watch, which is where my own scoring tends to land hardest. The world-building is unforced, the tone is consistent, and the central relationship still works. It loses a point for playing it safe and for a story that rarely surprises. Everything else it sets out to do, it does. 810.

Availability: In UK cinemas now, including IMAX, where Fraser’s photography earns the larger screen.


Update

Added since this review first appeared: the film arrived on Disney+ within a couple of months of its cinema run, where it slots in neatly after the third season of the series for anyone wanting the whole arc in order. Its record-setting audience score has held up, and it has settled into its reputation as the Disney-era Star Wars film that fans took to most readily, even as the critical line about it being comfortable rather than ambitious has stuck too.


BBFC content advice

BBFC PG certificate

Rated PG by the BBFC for moderate violence, threat, injury detail. The notes below may contain spoilers.

Violence: Moderate violence includes sustained fight scenes, shootings and stabbings. Characters are also electrocuted, set on fire, and attacked with bladed weapons. The violence occurs within a fantastical setting and is generally depicted without blood.

Threat and horror: There are frequent sequences of moderate threat which include jump scares and tense, menacing encounters with giant fantastical creatures, as well as gun and knife threat. A person is kidnapped and held captive and there are prolonged chase scenes.

Language: Very mild bad language includes uses of ‘damn’ and ‘hell’.

Injury detail: There is close-up sight of a bite wound from a fantastical creature, as well as occasional brief bloody injury detail.

Theme: A character becomes distressed when his companion remains unconscious after being injured. There are also references to death.

Source: British Board of Film Classification (bbfc.co.uk).

Filed under: Reviews